this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
923 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

87347 readers
3554 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

A backwards ticking clock appears accurate more frequently than a stopped one.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Thinking about it, if the clock runs backwards at the same rate, so -1 hour per hour, the rate of randomly being right is 2x the stand-still rate. This is also a linear function, at -1 its 4x per day, -0.5 is 3/d, 0 is 2, 0.5 is 1. When it runs true it is however very different, as it is either always exactly right (no offset) or never (with offset).

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

A broken clock running 6x its speed will also be correct much more often than a stopped clock.

[–] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 2 points 3 days ago

I think that's why this sort of phrase never made much sense to me, because in the same sense that the broken clock is right, a working clock with an offset (technically all of them) is almost never right (as you mention). Maybe it extends the metaphor, though, because while the working clock is never completely accurate, it's much more useful by being closer to the truth the vast majority of the time.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 4 days ago

How have I not heard this before... It seems more relevant then ever these days

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Where I'm from the saying is a little different: "A broken clock is still accurate twice a day"

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

Same, my comment is an extension of that more common notion.