449

The BBC has failed multiple times to serve Donald Trump’s family members with legal orders in the US President’s defamation case against the broadcaster.

The national broadcaster has been attempting to subpoena Mr Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr; his daughter, Ivanka Trump; and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, to require them to give evidence, however, multiple efforts have failed so far.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Metz@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As a german i don't understand what it means to "serve legal orders". Here in Germany, if the letter lands in the mailbox where you have registered your place of residence, it is considered delivered. Why make it unecessarily complicated?

[-] joe@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago

There are legal consequences to receiving a legal order and ignoring it; essentially the other side just gets whatever they're asking for without your input.

Now imagine all the perfectly valid ways that a letter can be delivered but the person never sees it.

Now imagine all the sketchy ways someone could prevent that letter from actually reaching the person, so that they get a default judgement.

I think it's better this way, even though it allows nonsense like what the Trump spawn are doing, because assumptions about whether they actually knew are removed. Not to mention, at best it's just a delaying tactic; eventually the judge will accept a good faith attempt to serve them and issue a default judgement.

[-] Defectus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

In Sweden, If it's important mail with legal concerns, you'll get a letter or an SMS that you have a letter to pick up at the nearest service point. The same way as you pick up a parcel. When you get I, you'll have to ID and sign it, then it's considered delivered to you.

[-] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

How many school shootings are allocated per year there?

[-] Defectus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Usually one every 5 or 10 years. But the last years there's been more

[-] joe@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

you'll get a letter

A letter to tell you that you have a letter. Kind of funny.

or an SMS

You register your phone number with the government? That's not something we do in the US.

When you get I, you'll have to ID and sign it, then it's considered delivered to you.

Hypothetically speaking, what happens if you ignore the pre-letter or the SMS and never pick up the important mail? What happens if you refuse to sign for it?

[-] Defectus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nope. You fan register your number at different agencies to get messages directly instead of ordinary email. So if it's from a court or law enforcement, it's usually a letter to pick up the letter.

If you ignore it they'll usually send someone to serve you I think. Or maybe fine you if it's not super important. Not sure.

[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

Adding to this, we all know the Hollywood portrayal of serving papers, and that one is real, but it's not the only one. Courts can and do approve alternate methods, including certified mail, email, and posting in local newspapers.

Source: Legal Eagle coverage of Reckless Ben/Bricks and Minifigs saga. In this case, the judge allowed service by email.

[-] Metz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

<EDIT>

Okay guys, i get it :D

I’ll take it as good news that such things didn’t occur to me. Guess there is no sketchy energy in this guy, haha.

</EDIT>

Now imagine all the perfectly valid ways that a letter can be delivered but the person never sees it.

I honestly do not know a single one.
I mean, there is not really a sketchy way to do that in germany (as far i know). Such important documents are usually sent as registered mail with proof of delivery. The mailman has to confirm that he did put it in the mailbox.

You are usually given a period of a few weeks or months to respond. If you don't check the mailbox at your registered address regularly, then it's your own fault. From the point of view of the court, the letter was delivered. I feel that is very fair.

[-] joe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Not one? Not even "unknowingly threw it away with some junk mail" or "unknowingly dropped between the counter and the refrigerator"?

The system in the US ensures someone has knowledge about a court order and the German system (as you have described it) assumes they do.

Both have pros and cons, but I think I'd prefer the US system. Considering the consequences can be life altering, I think ensuring the person knows, instead of assuming they do, is worth the extra hassle.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

Now imagine someone pretends to be you and signs for it. Imagine they steal it out of the letterbox after the carrier leaves. Now imagine that person was hired by the plaintiff, who now receives a default judgement.

[-] KeithD 1 points 1 week ago

Imagine someone is hired to serve you and thousands of other people papers and just claims they did. Now imagine that person was hired by the plaintiff, who now receives a default judgement.

This happens in the US, and sometimes the plaintiff deliberately chooses their process server to make it more likely.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

It's impossible to prove a negative. Even as recently as a month ago, I sent a birthday card to a friend in Germany and she said she hasn't gotten it yet.

I've mailed her letters and cards before and she usually gets them in a week.

I know she isn't lying.

Imagine if this was a legal notice.

I do understand what your saying but the possibility exists that a legal notice mailed to someone can be lost or misdelivered. The US has process servers where you can hire someone to serve legal papers to someone. In this case, the person notes the time and date of service.

In the absolute worst cases, some courts allow service to occur in a newspaper. This often happens in divorces when one party cannot be located due to abandoning them.

Most of the time in the US, service to their legal residence via certified mail that offers proof of delivery is usually enough for most cases.

[-] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 8 points 1 week ago

Eventually the court can authorize alternate means of service. Examples could be physically posting a copy to the door of the defendant’s last known address, electronically posting to the court’s website, publishing a notice in a newspaper, first class and/or certified mail, social media account or email.

[-] lemmelemmy@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

So that means they’re so slippery that none of them can be even served papers?

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Has to be in person or people will say someone stole the letter.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
449 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30930 readers
2147 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS