this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
88 points (96.8% liked)
PC Master Race
22219 readers
588 users here now
A community for PC Master Race.
Rules:
- No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No NSFW content.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I will never understand why it's called the Windows subsystem for Linux instead of the other way around? Doesn't Linux system for Windows make so much more sense?
Because their earlier thingy that added partial posix compatibility was called 'windows services for unix', they just continued with backwards naming scheme.
Is it because it's dropping the implied "running," as in "Windows Services for (running) UNIX (programs)" and "Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (programs)"?
I don’t like the name but I don’t think so.
Linux system for Windows = adapted Linux to be able to run in Windows Windows subsystem = adapted Windows to be able to run regular linux
Windows: subsystem for Linux