this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
140 points (98.6% liked)
Games
25858 readers
98 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think people are objecting because you are asking it to be something it isn't.
An open world game is something you immerse yourself in and you learn as you go. It is 100% incompatible with strict "win conditions" for every instance. Example: I was playing Fallout: New Vegas and ran into a character who was trying to collect bottlecaps. I offered her some of mine, but, discovering I had bottlecaps, she wanted all of them and IMMEDIATELY started shooting. That was a fun experience, not quite emergent game play, but at least surprising. That is the fun of open world games, they can be unpredictable and context-dependent, and sometimes you only know the context by getting shot at. Your job is to learn the rules of the world as best you can. Though I do understand why you get frustrated, I think it just indicates that open world games are just a genre that you don't enjoy, or at least there are aspects of them that rub you the wrong way.
It would be like if I said, "I don't like tetris because it doesn't have a story. Like, where are the cutscene animatics? Where is the character development?"
Edit: Might be better to say "A to Rob Stagecoach", but that is kind of implying your intent, when all your character is doing is waving it down to stop it, and the response depends on the context... like now every prompt has to predict what the response of the action will be.
This has been the best take I've seen on my issue with the game so far. Cuz you're right, I'm not super hot on open world games. Saying that, I did indeed take the whole experience as a learning moment but the game in general just didn't keep my interest afterwards. That was just the most memorable part of the game in my brief time trying it out.
And look, while I completely understand that not every game is gonna hand hold (I honestly prefer they don't), I do expect some sort of in-game example or..hell, even some side dialogue saying that could happen that could still be fully in-world and immersive. The game is huge, it's gonna have some flaws here and there, and at the end of the day it just wasn't for me. And me having an issue with a small part of the game has clearly rubbed some people the wrong way, and me the wrong way in their response.