24
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
24 points (96.2% liked)
TechTakes
2698 readers
138 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
This view on the community also explains his recklessness not only with aggressively monetizing HPMOR, but also his willingness to risk drawing JK Rowlings attention to his fanfiction (towards the end of HPMOR, one of his author's notes was looking for someone to reach out to her).
Rowling (and Warner Brothers) have been litigious with their IP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_disputes_over_the_Harry_Potter_series#Other_accusations_of_infringement . So this was a reckless move on EY's part, possibly indicating that he doesn't appreciate the delicate place fanfic (and its communities) are in.
Edit: thinking about the way Rowling has shown her true face over the past decade... "with all profits accruing to a UK charity" makes me wonder if in whatever fantasy universe Eliezer did talk Rowling into allowing published fanfic to be monetized for "charities", that money would all end up going to TERF "charities".
Somehow, the people who write stories where everyone just ends up in a giant fuck pile are both less vain and more dignified.
@scruiser @maol What on Earth did he think Daniel Radcliffe would have been able to do?
Lol, I assume he was just throwing shit at the wall and seeing what would stick?
What does Tom Cruise do for Scientology? (Not that I think Radcliffe would have fallen for it, I have the impression that he's a fairly level-headed guy as former child actors go)
The idea that the owners of HP would let a critical parody be published for profit (even if that profit would be donated to a UK charity) was naive at best. There's no "it's for charidee" protection for copyright law. You're right, it does indicate how distant he was from those communities, how little he knew about the history of fandom, and how little he cared about how his actions might affect them.