...Historically, scientists have viewed the cosmos as akin to a rock—complex, perhaps even beautiful, but formed through arbitrary events. Evolutionary cosmologists instead argue that universes, like living organisms, grow and reproduce, spinning off new universes with small variations from their progenitors. In doing so, these cosmic offspring are refined across generations into forms that maximize the number of universes yet to be born. Since the Big Bang, our universe, like any developing child, has been unfurling into an optimal shape.
Under this view, the universe is not a rock. It is an egg...
Smolin’s work was, in turn, inspired by physicists Bryce DeWitt and John Wheeler, who proposed that singularities inside black holes, the places where matter is crushed into a point of infinite density, might expand to produce new universes that follow different physics from the universes that produced them. Every universe—including our own—would, under this logic, have emerged from a Big Bang within a black hole.
Smolin realized that this hypothetical process would allow universes to reproduce, in a way, by making more black holes. And if those new universes could inherit the physics of their parents with small differences—just as new organisms inherit the genes of their parents with small differences—then universes could also evolve with each generation. Specifically, a form of cosmic natural selection would favor universes that make as many black holes as possible. Less fertile universes could persist, but they would produce far fewer offspring. So over time, an increasingly high proportion of universes would be optimized for black hole production—which would imply that our universe, given the odds, is one of those...
I mean, right away, doesn't this necessarily have to be true? Doesn't known physics simply break down in a singularity? Hell, most math breaks down once you introduce the number infinity into equations.
But, at the same time, black holes also evaporate into hawking radiation, stuff does come out of them. Which implies that something is going on inside them.
So with those two things combined, doesn't that mean the laws of physics "must* differ inside black holes?
That's literally what an integral is. Super misleading way of putting it. Dividing by zero is the issue because it is undefined.
It was a bit of intentional hyperbole, but I mean, technically it wasn't even inaccurate, I did say "most".