cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/72561
In 2020, a record number of people across the United States took to the streets in the movement for Black lives, demanding justice for George Floyd and victims of police violence. Last week, two of the country’s most popular progressives — Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani — threw this historic movement under the bus.
Speaking to ABC, AOC said that, “Woke 1 was crazy” — a phrase attributed to a tweet by New York City Council member Chi Ossé, referencing his social media posts from 2020. Days later, Mamdani more explicitly repudiated a key demand of the uprising, saying: “I’ve made very clear that I do not believe in defunding the police.”
But what’s actually “crazy” is calling yourself a socialist while believing in peaceful coexistence with the police.
Betraying Black Lives Matter and the Working Class
As many as 26 million people participated in protests in 2020 with the central demand of defunding the police. Many realized that cops — descendants of slave catchers and strike breakers — have nothing to do with public safety, and only exist to protect private property and repress the working class, including breaking strikes and brutalizing Black and Brown people, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ people.
AOC and Mamdani’s statements are a betrayal of this generation of people who have only seen police budgets and murders grow, with the backing of progressive Democrats. In fact, it was precisely this young, multi-racial coalition that brought progressives like Mamdani to power. The politics of these sectors were irrevocably forged in the fires of the BLM uprising, and we cannot separate the uprisings in 2020 from the movements of the following years — like the massive strikes and unionization efforts that led 2021 to be dubbed “the year of the worker,” the movement for Palestine that have shaken U.S. institutions and both parties to their core, and the fight against ICE.
To the extent that there were laughable aspects of 2020, they exposed the absurd notion that capitalist institutions can meaningfully address oppression. Like cops taking a knee before beating protesters, Democratic lawmakers draped in Kente cloth while brutally repressing protests, and brands posting hashtags in solidarity with Black struggle, only to reject any semblance of “woke” as soon as the political winds shifted.
But overwhelmingly, nothing materially changed — no excessively progressive policies were even implemented. As lawyer and organizer Dericka Purnell points out in The Guardian, “Ossé and AOC did not introduce any ‘woke 1’ legislation or resolutions that they now have to retract.” Mamdani, for his part, immediately began backtracking on his campaign promises, and only reversed course on expanding the police following immense pressure from the Democratic Socialists of America.
In this sense, as Maryam Alaniz explained, AOC and Mamdani “expose the political limits and contradictions of attempting to transform society while remaining inside the Democratic Party and administering institutions built to defend capitalist rule,” like the police. By governing as Democrats and facing the pressures of the political establishment and state apparatus, progressives betray both their supposed values and the masses who brought them to power with the hope of reforming this exploitative, oppressive system.
Why Leftists Must Be “Woke”
AOC and Mamdani’s supporters may argue that the two are simply being politically savvy. After all, many voters oppose defunding the police, so why not soften or outright abandon our more radical positions to gain popular support?
This logic is part of a broader perspective among reformist sectors, like those represented by Jacobin, that advocate focusing on economic, bread-and-butter demands at the expense of social issues in order to “win” sectors of the working class. But this perspective is incompatible with socialism, and counterproductive to building working-class power.
The working class is full of oppressed people, whether Black, Brown, or queer. This means that it is composed of the very sectors that police, in particular, exist to violently repress. And at the heart of socialism lies the notion that the working class holds a strategic position under capitalism due to its ability to grind the system — and profits — to a halt. As I wrote with my comrade Sybil Davis:
By organizing and withholding their labor, workers have the power to win key demands and force concessions from capitalists. Working-class unity is only possible by fighting against all these forms of oppression, taking up historical and theoretical studies of these different oppressions to better understand them, and taking up the specific demands of these marginalized groups, who often contain the most active and combative workers.
In other words, the fight against oppression, and against the police, cannot be separated from the fight against capitalist exploitation. This means that we must fight efforts by AOC, Mamdani, and others to reject the legacy of 2020 and minimize the struggle against oppression. And at a moment when record numbers of people are drawn to socialist ideas precisely because they help explain the brutal realities of capitalism, including policing, we need to seize the opportunity to break with the capitalist Democratic Party.
The post AOC and Mamdani Should Stop Throwing the Black Lives Matter Movement Under the Bus appeared first on Left Voice.
From Left Voice via This RSS Feed.
Not what I said. My focus was on Mamdani, who is not running in any primaries and already has an important job (which does seem to change things by all accounts). Wrapping a hit piece on Mamdani in a valid critique of AOC is dubious and unnecessarily divisive.
Not what I said. Defunding the police is not silly, little, or unimportant. But I don't think it's the panacea that its proponents tout it as. More importantly, it is not a promise that Mamdani ran on to become mayor. Even the article admits that.
I believe in holding politicians to their campaign promises, none of which he has violated to my knowledge. The people of NYC elected him on certain issues, and he is tending to those.
Maybe you are belittling the democratic expression of the will of the people? No politician is obliged to do what you and your friends on the fringe demand, just what they promised and were elected for.
The amount of funding for the police falls under none of these categories.
You're conflating issues, which is a slippery slope to arguing in bad faith.
Speaking of genocides specifically, Mamdani has taken a remarkably clear stance on the conduct of the Israeli government. If you ask me, he deserves praise and support instead of criticism.
There are much better targets, like the DINOs in the Democratic party, its corrupt leaders, or its members who don't believe Americans have a right to healthcare.
Trying to smear a politician who is actually doing his damn job is divisive not just because it pits the left against itself but also because it ultimately erodes the possibility of having a functioning political process in the first place.
If you start a moral panic each time an elected official doesn't do exactly what you want, you're adding fuel to the fire of those who would abandon the democratic form of government entirely. Let's not do that.
One last point: you are just as susceptible to "narratives" as anyone else, including me. Pretending that it isn't so makes you look ignorant, not me.
They weren't having a "moral panic" or being petty, they were responding to this:
Everyone "to the left of Hitler" should unite? Why would we want 99% Hitler? Because he's not 100% Hitler? If opposing a genocide it's purity testing, then maybe purity testing is good, actually? Or should we care more about 99% Hitler winning the election than the literal deaths of Palestinians?
If politicians want votes they must earn them.
As for Mamdani specifically, I'm well aware he's doing some good stuff as a mayor, I find it lamentable that he's not committed to internationalism and threw Venezuela and Cuba under the bus, and he has to always be criticized for this, but I'm glad he's at least doing something rather than immediately pulling an Obama.
deathmetaldawgy (cool name lol) said it best (added bold for emphasis):
Politicians in our countries are pushed very hard to protect capital and screw us over, without some degree of political action people's lives will never get better.
Not what I said. But your point is well taken that 1% left of Hitler isn't very left at all. The whole reason I argued this way was that criticism of the right is not a divisive issue at a time where we're seeing Hitler megafans and their Hitler megafan enablers taking the reins (Trump, Elon, etc.). What I should have said was that everyone to the right of X gets criticized by the extreme left. HOWEVER, there is no X because even Karl Marx himself, labor bless him, would never be allowed to take the top spot. Couldn't pass the purity test. Because no one can.
Look, my entire point is this: Mamdani has earned his keep so far and shown nothing but integrity. So a teeny tiny ^yay^ might be in order rather than trying to slander the man and feed into the right wing campaign against him. From your responses, I'm seeing that our positions don't seem awfully far apart on this, after all. So I'm going to bow out of the discussion at this point. Thank you, it's been fun.