271

https://fedihood.social/about

FediHood is a social network built around the place where you live. You choose a city and the topics you care about, then read what neighbours are saying and join in.

It stays a normal fediverse app. Your posts can reach Mastodon, PixelFed, Misskey and the rest, and posts from those servers reach you too.

Source code: https://git.holos.social/tom79/FediHood

There's only one instance so far: https://fedihood.social/

If new instances are created, they should show up here: https://fedihood.fediverse.observer/list

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

This seems unreasonable to me:

Only one browser at a time holds the keys decrypting new messages, moving needs a fresh backup from the active browser.

Messages sent after the backup was taken stay unreadable on this browser.

[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think an encrypted message feature is necessary for this kind of a web app. If people want to send encrypted messages, they can just switch to a different service for that. Like you get them to know on fedihood, exchange matrix handles or phone numbers or whatever, and then you can use a different service for private communication.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 weeks ago

Because AI Surveillance states are nothing for concern.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Less friction is better though. And not everyone knows where else to go for E2E.

The problem to me would be development burden, but its alreast implemented so...

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

E2EE is very hard to implement safely. serious cryptography is not a hobbyist project. just look at all the problems matrix has had with it.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

Makes e2ee much easier that way.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I feel like it should still work if making a backup didn't clear a browser, and restoring to a second browser should let both work.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

key management is lot harder. signal does not support multi-clients for a reason, you can look at the history of matrix with encryption to find out what are the problem is. I'm not sure they even fixed or just know of all the failure modes of it.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Matrix is a good example I think: It allows a client to authorize another client so both work. It's not the same 'backup' scenario, but proves the concept can work.

Is there an easy reference for the history there? I've used it over the years but not regularly enough to see it changing.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I don't know of any, but check out the matrix.org youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/Matrixdotorg they made presentations through multiple matrix conferences about how are they fixing multi client encryption

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
271 points (98.9% liked)

Fediverse

43755 readers
11 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS