this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
1655 points (97.6% liked)

Memes

45746 readers
1512 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Speaking of the headline, politicians when encouraged to attempt peace through negotiation rather than insisting on decisive victory being the only way

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (14 children)

can't tell if this is some genuine post, or pro-russia shilling for peace negotiationing between Ukraine and Russia

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Can't you shill for peace and be pro Ukraine?

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No, because you cannot make a peace contract with a liar and thief, he will break it as soon as it fits him

He has zero regard for civilised relations between countries. Suing for peace he sees as weakness, violence as strength. A person who thinks this way can never be convinced to leave others alone. The only way is a defeat so thorough they are unable to retaliate in decades even if they try their hardest. Or death. Preferably death.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

I didn't say they should ask nicely for a peace treaty.

[–] spacesweedkid27@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That is true but that does not answer the question. My opinion is that if you are pro peace you are automatically pro Russia, pro Ukraine or ideally both (I'm talking about the people and culture in it and not their leaders).

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Again, if peace means another war as soon as putler has recovered - versus defeating the asshole as hard as possible - then it is advantageous to putler. So, arguing for peace at the moment, is arguing for the attackers advantage.

Of course there will be peace. Once putler is defeated or preferably dead.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, Putin + Hitler = Putler. Took me a moment.

It's okay to be scared. It's okay to want the war to stop because you're scared. It's okay to want peace, but

arguing for peace at the moment, is arguing for the attackers advantage.

hits the nail on the head. Putin pulled the war Genie out of it's bottle and it won't go back in until his regime is defeated. It's okay to want peace and to fight for it, but to argue they need to negotiate now is either completely tone deaf or outright advocacy for Putin's regime.

[–] spacesweedkid27@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not arguing for Putin, I am arguing for the people in this war.

But yes I see your point. Maybe NATO could threaten with nuclear war if Russia ever attacks anything again, but that won't change the problem.

I think the only way to stop Putin is with a revolution inside of Russia.

Russia promised that they would be a democratic country but since Putin's "democratic" elections that promise was broken.

In my country we have a law inside the core of our basic lawbook that enables every institution and every human being living in the country to stop a dictatorship to arise by force because it is treated as self defense.

[–] brianorca@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It depends on the terms of that peace. If Russia wants peace, they can withdraw to their 1997 treaty borders. They can not be allowed to hold Ukraine land gained through conquest.

[–] Rubennaatje@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can, but those aren't criticising the West and Ukraine, but rather russia.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Huh? Not sure what you're saying.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Considering the Ukrainian position is basically "any loss of territory is unacceptable", there is little room for both peace negotiation AND support for Ukraine simultaneously. Tough position.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see it as tough. Wishing for peace doesn't mean I want Ukraine to surrender.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I guess I've spent too much time seeing disingenuous calls for "peace" on the internet, mostly by pro-russia shills, with the intent of painting the western support of Ukraine as evil warmongering or something.

We do wish for peace ultimately, but there's a whole lot of violence to happen if it is going to be on Ukrainian terms, because russia does not look like it wants to back down.

[–] nomadwannabe@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You word it like Ukraine is somehow responsible for the violence because she won’t back down.

This entire clusterfuck is Putin’s fault. Not wanting to give up territory is completely understandable.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you're putting words in my mouth, never did I imply or think that Ukraine is responsible for what is happening, or that Ukraine is not right in wanting all their territory back. However, it is factual that if Ukraine wants to secure its territory, which is entirely justified, it will not be by means that are describable as "peace" or "peaceful", because russia is not backing down like complete idiots(a common theme).

Is what I am saying false?

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with the other guy, you're wording it in a way that is attributing all the agency to Ukraine and none to Russia. It probably would lead to much more needless death in the long run, because it sets the stage for additional aggression. Which of course would be staged from a much more consolidated position that would be much harder to roll back than if Ukraine just rolls it back now.

[–] nomadwannabe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for finding a way to word it better than I did, that’s exactly what I meant.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

kinda depends on whether or not you want Ukraine to give up crimea.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want Ukraine to beat back Russia and the war to end. That's a wish for peace.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

that's basically the decisive victory from the comment I originally replied to though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

As the red starred soldiers give up to the blue banded I've got an opinion on that topic.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] brianorca@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends. And Russia is more likely to try again in another neighbor. Like they have multiple times already.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Letting Russia consolidate its territorial gains, build bases and continue the war in a few years is a terrible idea. They are more than welcome to turn their tanks around and leave Ukraine.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Русскии военыи корабл, иди на хуй.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ooh, big tough guy brave enough to be against peace and diplomacy in badly translated Ukrainian!

Just for the record, I am not, nor have I ever been a "Russian warship" nor have I ever been on the side of the war criminal Putin.

"You're either with us and declare our warlike methods perfect or you're with the enemy" was bullshit when Dubya said a simplified version of it in the early 2000s and it's not any more true now.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The original sentence was in Russian, not Ukrainian.

How attacked you felt by that quote says a lot.

The only ones who get to decide Ukraine's future are the Ukrainians. We rich cunts here in the West with our comfortable lives should shut the fuck up.

[–] crackajack@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Oh, the Ukrainians wanted to be closer to the more prosperous and democratic West instead of being with us perpetually mopey, subservient-to-dictators Russians?! How dare the Ukrainians decide for their own sovereignty! We should punish and genocide them for exercising their own autonomy! Us Russians know what is better for our little brothers! We're totally not insecure gits who long for the good old days of having a powerful empire! The only ones to blame for Russia's loss of prestige and embarrassing military losses are the Ukrainians. The Ukrainians put this upon themselves!

--totally not a bot larping as W*sterner

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The original sentence was in Russian, not Ukrainian.

The translator detected it as Ukrainian, not my fault I don't speak either language, contrary to your childish insinuations 🤷

How attacked you felt by that quote says a lot.

I agree that it said a lot that I just calmy corrected you while lightly mocking your tough guy act rather than let your nonsense bother me.

The only ones who get to decide Ukraine's future are the Ukrainians. We rich cunts here in the West with our comfortable lives should shut the fuck up.

You know that's exactly what pro-Russian Ukrainians who are ACTUALLY cheering for Putin's war say, right?

Neither you, nor the victims of war nor the perpetrators of war get to decide what I think about war. That's not how ideology works.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not gonna do a quote war on a nice Saturday afternoon. I'll just say this: fuck putin and fuck his dumb fucking war. If you disagree with that I hope you'll come to your senses on your own, since I can't force you

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

fuck putin and fuck his dumb fucking war.

Of course. That's what I've been saying all along.