PieFed Meta

4850 readers

95 users here now

Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.

Wiki

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

rimu@piefed.social

What's the point of PieFed trying "accountability" features on how people vote but not the reactions? (lemmy.nz)

submitted 19 hours ago by thewal@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piefed_meta@piefed.social

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just in case it hasn't been discussed yet, votes may not have binary exact meaning but reactions does

From retrofed and piefed.social how this user is trying to be sneaky

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I can agree that it might be a good idea to remove some of the more antagonistic emojis from selection. However you can't necessarily enforce that on other PieFed instances.

[–] Snoopy@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Or repport & ban the account for homophobia.

[–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How do you know the react was to the title and not the summary?

[–] Snoopy@piefed.social 2 points 8 hours ago

Good point, i haven't read the summary below. Usually people react to the title rather summary. So we check user history.