468
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
468 points (99.2% liked)
interestingasfuck
9634 readers
1663 users here now
For exceptionally interesting content
Rules:
- Posts must be interesting
- Posts must be based in reality
- No hateful content
- No harmful content
- Beauty is in the eye of the beholder
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
How we are able to pick up a 30 watt or whatever signal from that far away is kinda bonkers
It helps that we know exactly where to look for it the signal, but I agree it's insane that it's so far away and we can still communicate with it 49 years later. This was launched in 1977, it's running on half-century-old tech and still partly functional. And the main reason it's only partly functional is that we shut down features to save on power.
The scientists have also done some major updates to bypass failed components as well. The oh shit of pushing binaries to such an iconic device almost a light day out must be intense.
It's a testament to both how easy and difficult it is to look out in to space.
Easy, because even the weakest signal travels immense distances, as there is almost nothing to slow it down or stop it.
Difficult, because the only reason we can receive this signal is because we can pinpoint the exact location and frequency of said signal.
There could be aliens sending us messages right now, but buried in the noise of the cosmos. ๐คทโโ๏ธ
The Deep Space Network uses 70 meter parabolic antennas, along with multiple 34 meter antennas located in California, Spain, and Canberra Australia. Pointed precisely at the known location of the probe allows the antennas to detect enough of the signal to decode it from the background noise.