553
submitted 1 week ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The US Army’s Apache helicopters are crashing at a historically high rate amid a widespread problem with the model’s transmission, according to a CNN analysis of military accident data.

The helicopter type has experienced five major crashes since October, and a deadly mishap earlier this month in Texas killed two soldiers, sparked a wildfire and led the Army to temporarily bar Apache pilots from conducting routine training flights. With that crash, fiscal year 2026 is on pace to be the second worst for Apache flight accidents since a new model of the AH-64 was rolled out in 2011.

The Army announced that the pause in training flights, which exempted units deployed to the Middle East, ended Wednesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is 0 conclusive contemporaneous historical evidence that King David actually existed.

The Torah itself... was likely written and compiled during roughly 500 BC to 300 BC. David is traditionally supposed to have existed in approximately 1100 BC to 1000 BC. The oldest supposed reference to David is from 925 BC, and this interpretation of a highly damaged relief is contested, theres again 0 contemporaneous evidence, and just a scant bit of contentious/dubiously providenced evidence later than that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David#Historicity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davidic_line#Historicity

Given that much of the Torah more or less seems to be a fantastical rewriting of the history of the people exiled from Judea/Canaan/Israel, largely put together when/after they were allowed to return to their homeland by Cyrus, after Persia conquered the Neo Babylonians, so that they could strengthen their group identity with a collective mythic origin...

In all likelihood, if David was real, he would have been more like a chieftain of basically a large village, who was then tall-taled into a much exaggerated ruler of a much exaggerated 'Kingdom', in furtherance of creating that collective unifying myth.

Hopefully I do not need to tell you Moses and Joshua are entirely mythical figures, the Exodus did not actually happen, nor did the Israelite conquest of Canaan.

The reason why God is a jealous God and you shall have no other representations of any other Gods and he smites all other Gods and such is because Yahweh more or less is El + Ba'al, renamed, and amalgamated with the attributes and titles and escapades of other Canaanite deities. The Yahwist cult was an offshoot of the general Canaanite religion, that started roughly somewhere bewteen the 13th and 9th centuries BC, that decided their amalgamation God was superior to the original pantheon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahwism

The tale of the conquest of Canaan by Joshua is basically a dramatized allegory of the Yahwists gaining traction and popularity in Judah/Israel.

After that group returned from Babylon to their original homeland, influenced by the two-god paradigm of Zoroastrianism... their original homeland was at that time populated by people whom some of which were Yahwists, but many of whom more or less still held to the polytheist version of Canaanite religion.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

I appreciate that Torah was written during 2nd temple. But the relatively recent 1st temple history and prophets cursing their kings, and declaring God himself will destroy the temple, and contradicting Moses law, seems to chronicle a fall that seems too intricate. But, there is archeological evidence that Jerusalem and Judah (David and Solomon) (surround it) had small 10000 population. That Israel was a more powerful friendly kingdom to the north, and Judahan history got rewritten after Syrians invaded and displaced Israel's citizens to Judah. Very hard to judge if its too crazy, when religion continuously proves very crazy.

The more likely history of Judah is that the Philistines forced Egypt to reduce its empire, and Saul, just before David, consolidated the few poor tribes of Judah in defense to Philistines, with David paying tribute to Philistines to survive. Yahweh war god's chosen people never fought or vanquished anyone anywhere near Judah/Israel. It is also Israel side that laid claim to a Moses heritage instead of the Judah/David side. It would all get merged later after Israel was invaded.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

I appreciate that Torah was written during 2nd temple. But the relatively recent 1st temple history and prophets cursing their kings, and declaring God himself will destroy the temple, and contradicting Moses law, seems to chronicle a fall that seems too intricate. But, there is archeological evidence that Jerusalem and Judah (David and Solomon) (surround it) had small 10000 population. That Israel was a more powerful friendly kingdom to the north, and Judahan history got rewritten after Syrians invaded and displaced Israel's citizens to Judah. Very hard to judge if its too crazy, when religion continuously proves very crazy.

I think I broadly agree with all of this.

Well, 'Syrians' is a somewhat problematic term, but basically yes.

The more likely history of Judah is that the Philistines forced Egypt to reduce its empire, and Saul, just before David, consolidated the few poor tribes of Judah in defense to Philistines, with David paying tribute to Philistines to survive. Yahweh war god's chosen people never fought or vanquished anyone anywhere near Judah/Israel. It is also Israel side that laid claim to a Moses heritage instead of the Judah/David side. It would all get merged later after Israel was invaded.

Ah thats an interesting further uh, wrinkle in the story, I'd guess you could say.

Plausible, certainly, I think.

But yes it gets... very complicated, very fast, the more detail one tries to cover, but again, broadly that all seems plausible to likely, to me.

Sorry didn't mean to be purely critiqueing, I thought you had a pretty good take on all the... gnostic complexities running parellel to developments in Judaism itself, post 2nd temple destruction and such.

I just had to quibble with a flat out assertion of David as historical, hahaha, maybe I was too zealous =P

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 6 days ago

All the myths are mixed and recycled from Sumer, to Egypt, to Canaan, India, China, Persia, etc, and were never meant to be taken at face value is the point. But you'd have to delve deep into Kabbalah, ancient Sumerian, Egyptian, Sufism, Tantra, Babylonian Talmudic, Buddhist, Zoroastrian, Gnostic mysticism to get scratch the surface. I've been looking into it for decades, especially the last three or four years, because I had time and regular internet. Especially look to understand PaRDeS, the multi-layered garden, from which we get the word, "Paradise," and multiple other esoteric myths, like the 72 names, Abra Melin, the Ethiopian Bible, etc etc etc. It's quite enthralling, and while I don't take my faith literally, anymore, I do take it more seriously. "Milk and meat," and "When I was a child, I thought, reasoned, understood as a child, when I became a woman, I put away childish things." It's entirely worth the time and effort, should you decide to embark on the journey. Peace/Salaam/Shalom, either way.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

I have gone through rabbit hole of inconsistencies, but I don't obsess over whether they are copies of other myths/legends. I study the more modern corruptions/inventions. I understand Jesus's words as worth following, independent of any of his miracles/origin/heaven. I object to a church dogma based on 1. every word in the bible has to be true, or anarchy. 2. if there are contradictions the first chronological event must be more true. The convenience of this dogma of Moses Hierarchy and war as primacy is that it strengthens any Church hierarchy, and then through Constantine (first emperor to convert to Christianity and make it state religion) make the Romans the chosen people authorized to genocide and abuse any heretic who might consider Christ as not agreeing with Pope/Emperor.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 6 days ago

I understand Jesus's words as worth following, independent of any of his miracles/origin/heaven. I object to a church dogma based on 1. every word in the bible has to be true, or anarchy... The convenience of this dogma of Moses Hierarchy and war as primacy is that it strengthens any Church hierarchy, and then through Constantine (first emperor to convert to Christianity and make it state religion) make the Romans the chosen people authorized to genocide and abuse any heretic who might consider Christ as not agreeing with Pope/Emperor.

In this we are in agreement.

Blessings, friend.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
553 points (99.8% liked)

News

39029 readers
2312 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS