this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
88 points (70.6% liked)

Memes

56767 readers
628 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but that doesn't detract from the act itself.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How does it not? A random assassination isn't revolutionary, nor does it advance the worker struggle. Organizing does, it positions us in a better place for revolution.

[–] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I am not denying that organization is what allows revolutionary actions to be successful. But they don't have to be part of organized action to be revolutionary actions. Likewise, the organization itself, though necessary is not revolutionary in itself.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Without revolutionary theory, there can be no revolutionary practice. Random assassinations aren't revolutionary. Organizing in a revolutionary party is revolutionary because it advances the revolutionary position.

[–] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If a revolutionary party starts a series of actions designed to topple the system and a person with no theory knowledge and unorganized carries out the same type of action, then it is not a revolutionary action?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How can one person carry out revolutionary action? One person cannot create a revolution.

[–] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Let's put an extreme example. There is a regime that is very top heavy. The assassination of that person will destroy the regime and change it by something else. That would be a revolutionary act, since it would topple a whole political system and replace it by something else. Now let's assume a single person carried it out.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

This example is a fantasy, though, and isn't how society works. This is why theory is necessary, not just vibes.

[–] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 1 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

Similar things have happened, although I don't know if any by a single person but it is not unthinkable that they might, so the hypothetical remains valid.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

No they have not. The hypothetical is invalid because it doesn't accurately portray reality.

[–] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 minutes ago

there have been several assassinations of heads of state by individual people and several assassinations that have led to regime changes, so it is valid.