This is a few weeks old, but I felt it is relevant here. Noticeably absent from the "speculation" as to the reasons fewer people in their 50's are working is the elephant in the room: Ageism. I gave up searching for work because it's painfully obvious my capability is not the issue. AARP has permanent support education for 50+ people trying to get hired.
All I hear about with respect to frustrations being unable to find a job is focused on the youngest, while it's the eldest that are being forced out at alarming rates. The worst part is we don't have any recovery path, and some of us are supporting adult children who can't find work.
We either navigated all the pratfalls life throws at us and have savings enough to "survive", or we didn't, and we become another near invisible member of the predominantly elder population of homeless standing by intersections hoping for a handout.
Next January possibly millions of over 50 people thrown out of work and unable to find any job (even minimum wage jobs) will lose their health coverage, since Medicaid begins requiring 20 hours per week of work to qualify.
We are well beyond "fearing dystopia" now. We've been living it for a decade, some would say longer.
Someone else already got to it before me to show that ageism is really a thing. However, I still want to comment.
The dirty little secret about unemployment statistics in the United States of America is that it only counts people who are considered searching for work.
Searching for work means they're receiving unemployment benefits. My benefits ran out six to eight months ago. I am not considered unemployed.
Consistently, month after month, the percentage of the population that is in the workforce is decreasing. I believe that statistic is called the workforce participation rate. This is why the unemployment rate is so low. Everybody who can't find a job and finally gives up drops off the list.
I saw a figure that I can't get the source for at the moment that states we have about a 14% rate of people who are unemployed who want to work.
The department of labour defines it as anyone receiving benefits or still seeking employment. Seeking employment is defined as making specific efforts to find a job in the last 4 weeks. So no, that is not correct.
The labour participation rate keeps track of the percentage of the civilian non-institutional population (ages 16 and older) that is either working or actively looking for a job
It has been in decline since the year 2000 largely due to the baby boomers reaching retirement age.
And how does the department of labor measure the number of people still seeking employment. What data are they gathering to measure that. Where are they getting it?
https://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm#unemployed
I have never seen such a questionnaire when I was unemplyed past being able to collect benefits. 4 weeks after my unemployment ran out I become considered "not in the labor force". There is no followup program to identify people who are no longer considered in the labor force, yet are still seeking work.