20

Hi there, I wouldn't be making this post if I saw another one about it, but...

I both dislike centralization and nonfree Javascript. I believe the spirit of Lemmy embraces both ideals, however, Cloudflare both promotes a centralized internet that requires the execution of nonfree scripts to interact with it. I understand that bots (epsecially LLM powered) are a pervasive issue that plagues this (and many other) communities. I also understand that being logged-in prevents the requirement of using Cloudflare's captcha, so that only a one-time login is required, although I'm constantly blocking requests to cloudflareinsignts.com.

Finally, I understand that I the alternatives are not necessarily effective, although it seems to work for many projects. I'm not saying other solutions are better for short or medium term, but I was wondering if the management were planning on eventually replacing it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

What problem would be solved by this hypothetical migration?

[-] Feyter@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago

I trink this is rooted in forward thinking. If cloud flare gets a monopoly in that position (what it arguably already has), they can project all the power of a monopoly about us...

So this is more about preventing future problems and not solving problems that exist.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So this is more about preventing future problems and not solving problems that exist.

The question remains unanswered: which problems, hypothetically or otherwise, would this migration solve?

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Cloudflare projecting its dominating power onto lemmy?

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev -1 points 22 hours ago

Cloudflare projecting its dominating power onto lemmy?

I'm sorry, this assertion is meaningless scaremongering. What exactly is "projecting it's dominating power" supposed to mean?

And by the way, may I point out that site maintainers purposely adopted Cloudflare to serve specific purposes?

[-] Feyter@programming.dev 2 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)

OK, if there is a monopolistic instance between you and the rest of the world that decides who can reach you and who not and you are depending on that single monopolistic instance, I think we all agree that this is a bad thing.

Potential threads from this are (but not limited to):

  • cloudflare going up in price and you have to take it.
  • cloudflare is blocking or restricting access to your page, because of political dispute.
  • cloudflare collects meta data to reconstruct user behavior and social relationship and uses it to pressure individuals.
[-] Kissaki@programming.dev 1 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

to serve specific purposes

You're asking for specifics on their concerns while not providing the specifics that were already in place in your claim here.

They acknowledged and included reasons for the Cloudflare adoption in their original post.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 6 minutes ago

You’re asking for specifics on their concerns while not providing the specifics that were already in place in your claim here.

If you want to change something, the very least that's expected of you is that the change actually fixes something.

If you can't even put together a description of exactly what's broken, obviously you can't tell if your proposal is even able to fix anything.

And may I point out the fact that this very discussion starts by admitting that alternatives are not effective?

Change for the sake of change is a pointless endeavour. Moreso if it comes from mindless militancy.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Personally I cannot visit most crimeflare sites because it just gives me an infinite captcha loop... so moving away from them seems like that would solve that issue.

[-] blamster19@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

I use Firefox Focus on my mobile and I can't enter sites with CloudFlare because it says my browser is incompatible. It gets annoying when I ramp up my privacy on the Internet and sites outright refuse to load if they see I don't allow cookies and trackers. I'd rather see broken js-free website than pitch black CloudFlare page.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 4 points 22 hours ago

I use Firefox Focus on my mobile and I can’t enter sites with CloudFlare because it says my browser is incompatible.

I also use Firefox Focus and I never experienced that issue at all. Are you sure this is a Cloudflare issue?

Also, site owners are purposely using Cloudflare to protect themselves from abnormal traffic. If site owners are the ones paying Cloudflare to lift these barriers, why do you interpret this issue as a problem created by Cloudflare?

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 2 points 21 hours ago

Are you sure this is a Cloudflare issue?

For shits and giggles I logged into programming.dev with Firefox Focus, and suffice to say I'm posting this with that browser.

I also did some tweaking and I did noticed that it I configure Firefox Focus to strip all types of tracking (akin to NoScript) then Cloudflare complains about extensions.

[-] blamster19@programming.dev 1 points 21 hours ago

Exactly that, Cloudflare complains about extensions. It's a matter of aggressive tracking protection. I can view Anubis protected sites just fine, only the Cloudflare ones prevent access.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 18 hours ago

Exactly that, Cloudflare complains about extensions.

What you are describing is not browser incompatibility. It's default fallback page that Cloudflare shows when it fails to run its javascript code.

Site owners such as programming.dev maintainers purposely onboarded Cloudflare to run those scripts, as that's how their anti-abuse system works.

[-] blamster19@programming.dev 1 points 14 hours ago

The 'browser incompatibility' is what's written on the fallback page. The question was about the problem that migration from Cloudflare would solve and I provided one particular problem. Not that it affects me personally, because I use a standalone app for Lemmy, but I assume there are some people that do not wish to run Cloudflare js

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 2 points 13 hours ago

The ‘browser incompatibility’ is what’s written on the fallback page.

No. The page clearly says "Incompatible browser extension or network configuration".

It then lists a number of troubleshooting steps to get the page to work.

The question was about the problem that migration from Cloudflare would solve and I provided one particular problem.

I don't think so. Site maintainers are expecting your browser to run the scripts to detect and prevent abuse, and you are going way out of your way to not run them. You are not describing a problem.

[-] arsCynic@piefed.social 2 points 23 hours ago
[-] Deebster@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Personally, my local Cloudflare seems to have some problem with IPv6 and some sites won't load. On my desktop I've set Firefox to use IPv4 for such sites, but on my phone I need to use mobile data (which doesn't support IPv6). I don't think it's a common problem, but you did ask.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Personally, my local Cloudflare seems to have some problem with IPv6 and many sites won’t load.

Some global ISPs still struggle with IPv6. I recall that until somewhat recently Vodafone didn't supported it at all. Are you sure this is a Cloudflare issue?

[-] Deebster@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Cloudflare gives its 522 error, but I can load via IPv6 from the same city. I've also found the issue with Cf in front of servers I run on a different continent, so I've been able to do some good testing and have spent plenty of time looking into it. I haven't found any other Cloudflare locations with the problem, but there's plenty of them.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Cloudflare gives its 522 error

This means Cloudflare is forwarding the request but the origin server times out. Meaning, it's the origin server that is unable to handle the IPv6 request.

https://developers.cloudflare.com/support/troubleshooting/http-status-codes/cloudflare-5xx-errors/error-522/

[-] Deebster@programming.dev 1 points 21 hours ago

Please reread the first sentence of what you just replied to.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 0 points 18 hours ago

I read, and then I posted. Is there anything in my reply that I can explain to you?

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
20 points (100.0% liked)

Programming.dev Meta

2767 readers
32 users here now

Welcome to the Programming.Dev meta community!

This is a community for discussing things about programming.dev itself. Things like announcements, site help posts, site questions, etc. are all welcome here.

Links

Credits

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS