view the rest of the comments
Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
6. Defend your opinion
This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
Simply being unfunny (to you) doesn't make it like BBT. That show also employed laugh tracks to pretend it was funnier than it is (maybe you could find something comparable on the audiobook but you can't put that on the book itself and idk because I don't listen) and a lot of misogyny and other humor about stereotypes (which if DCC has, it's done by characters that are supposed to be problematic).
And yeah the struggle is coming, one thing that's easy to forget is everything happens on a fairly short time frame within its universe. That being said I controversially don't really like the audiobook mostly because I don't like the chosen voices for Carl or Donut. Makes Carl seem like some badass action hero type (whereas I see her as more of a bumbling tinkerer), and it makes Donut seem like a cartoon character (when he's a sassy teen who grew up in pageants and is trying to make sense of her newfound sapience and how to have real conversations with people).
Also "most monsters are only a derivative name on a 2-3years old meme", yeah that makes sense, book 3 came out 5 years ago.
Obviously you don't have to like it, but I disagree with your comparison and some of your interpretation and wanted to voice that.
That’s ok.
The red neck goblin in the first book are a fucking awful meme/joke. The books are made for an « in group » like BBT was that’s where I came with the comparaison
I feel that the writing is circular (and so far) the 3 books are written in the same way with beats I find really predictable… like BBT
But I’m happy to disagree and being called out if I’m hurtful
The content of the books still is what it is, but at least it's somewhat self aware about this dynamic since
spoiler
the personality and memories of dungeon NPCs are canonically calibrated with lowest common denominator mass media appeal in mind