20
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
20 points (64.3% liked)
United States | News & Politics
9435 readers
836 users here now
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Wtf are you even saying, her punishment should not be raped by other raping troops that doesn't solve anything.
Yes and in order for that to happen you need to murder-rape militants to not be murder-rape militants because if they're murder-rape militants then they're going to
a) murder
b) rape
So if she doesn't want to get raped she should not be part of the murder-rape militants because that's literally what they do
It's the answer to the question "who raped her".
Yes, and the fact that a woman working with them was raped and the military faced no consequences just incentivises the troops to continue raping because they can do no wrong.
Yes and she is part of that very military. She is one of the rape-terror militants which rapes (mostly non-combatant) women and men all over the world without any consequences. Which brings us to the point of the post. It's because the rape-terror forces face no consequences for rape and terror that the rape-terror force where she got raped isn't facing any consequences when she got raped either.
The solution is to not be part of the rape-terror force. Not try to make it so they only rape people who aren't part of the rape-terror force.
Why are you attacking out against someone from the inside of the literal military industrial complex's belly, publicising what happened? I understand the anger at the system of the horrifying meat grinder, but directing that anger at someone speaking out helps nobody.
If you start to dehumanise them so much that their bodily autonomy is sacrificed, what do you stand for?
Can you stop pretending this woman worked at McDonalds and was actually a mercenary mass murdering brown people for money?