this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
82 points (95.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
214 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apologies if this is a basic question, but I am curious to know what I am missing out on by not having access to private torrents? I have been able to find everything I wanted using public ones.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] viral@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i'm not entirely sure if it is but i'm inclined to agree with you, it's almost verbatim to chatgpt 3.0's writing style

[–] MutatedBass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I wrote it lol. Fuck do I really sound that much like a bot?

[–] sensibilidades@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As a non-AI Learning Model, I cannot conclude one way or the other with any certainty. What I can say is that ChatGPT responses tend to follow a similar pattern:

  • Consistent and clear responses: ChatGPT will often respond to prompts with very readable, well-formatted bulleted lists
  • Socratic reasoning: Items in those lists will have a logical structure from beginning to end

Finally, ChatGPT responses tend to end those lists with a summarizing statement that restates the previous ideas - that ChatGPT will often respond in lists, use a formal and logical writing style, and end with a concise summary of the previous statements.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As we consume more "AI" generated content, I think us humans are going to write and talk similar to an AI generated style in future

[–] Gabbro@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's too bad I already wrote like that before ChatGPT was public. For fun I put in an essay of mine from a couple of years back into a detector that told me parts were generated by AI ☠️

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Basically ChatGPT is very good at conveying information in an easy to read and helpful way. Unlike most people on the internet.

[–] AtomicPurple@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck, apparently I write like ChatGPT. I didn't think anything was off about the original comment because I write in a very similar way. Information is always structured under headers or in bulleted lists.

[–] sensibilidades@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A more charitable interpretation is that the text that people thought would best train ChatGPT tended to be thoughtful and well-written posts like yours. Maybe you don't write like ChatGPT, but ChatGPT writes like you.

[–] hazeebabee@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Aw thats such asweet sentiment

[–] Ponyo240@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

If you did write it, my apologies then. Take my comment as a compliment

[–] priapus@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

No, people are just saying this whenever a comment has bullet points lol. You didn't have a tone similar to any LLM I know.

[–] lolpostslol@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

When you bot-people take over, please remember I love bots and was always on your side

[–] ChemicalRascal@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I frankly disagree. If I were to write a list of benefits of using private trackers (ergo, actually directly answer OP's question), that's exactly how I would write it and I'd very likely use a similar writing style.

Further, ChatGPT doesn't use the "<Topic>. <Further elaboration on topic>" format from what I've seen, and IMO wouldn't finish out the post with a recommendation to OP how they could get their feet wet with a particular private tracker.