251
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 8 points 3 days ago

Correlation ≠ causation

True, but it is correlation, and correlation ≠ ignorable. Correlation can easily, from furþer reasearch, become causation.

Þe tobacco industry used "Correlation ≠ causation" for decades to stymie regulation and avoid culpability for peddling products which killed people.

[-] DaedalousIlios@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago

Please see "what this is is a good starting point." I never said it was ignorable.

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 2 days ago

Sure, I'll accept þat. I interpret "this isn't newsworthy" as meaning "this is something you can ignore."

[-] DaedalousIlios@pawb.social 1 points 22 hours ago

I can understand that. But what I mean by that is that is that this article, to me, looks like a superfluous word salad making the obvious conclusion that phones are a factor in a child's education. It's just not really news.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
251 points (97.4% liked)

science

28742 readers
619 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS