729
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Yasm@programming.dev to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Car centric society is just bad period.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I see you’ve never lived in a rural area

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

80% of the world's population live in urban areas. So the focus should be on how to build urban areas that are less car-dependent, or preferably car-free. Nobody cares about cars in rural areas.

[-] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 12 points 2 days ago

Most people dont.

[-] Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Having a public transport/cycling/pedestrian centric society doesn't mean you get rid of private vehicle ownership in totality. It just means private vehicles are more for people who actually need them (like folks in rural areas) than pointless status symbols and the like. Also I've lived rural and known people who've had vehicle cooperatives (vehicles are shared) that worked out better for everyone.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
729 points (99.2% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27775 readers
499 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS