228
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 4 days ago

If nobody does anything, it shows the constitution is worthless. It can't or won't be enforced.

We get what we get until then.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If nobody does anything, it shows the constitution is worthless.

What if some people do some things, but they're mostly perfunctory or performative and done more as a means of fund raising off gullible rubes than obstructing a tyrannical state government?

What if other people do things, but are immediately categorized as lawless radicals and foreign-sponsored insurgents who want the country to fail?

What if still other people do things, but they are in support of the tyrannical administration - either explicitly through armed support or implicitly through financing and propagandizing in defense of the state?

What if a large body of people don't know what to do or who to align with, because so many different high profile people with different motivations and ideologies all claim they are Constitutional supporters acting in opposition to anti-Constitutional tyrants?

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I seen more action when George W Bush got elected, at least from the entertainment group. Now everyone seems afraid to do anything.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Twenty years of people being beaten down will have that effect. The degree of police brutality and surveillance is suffocating

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 4 days ago

If you consider that "doing something," then that's part of the problem.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Someone didn't learn what the word "thing" means.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Asking a bunch of open-ended what-if questions to contrast what's actually happening is fine, but @underpantsWeevil@lemmy.world and apparently you aren't seeing that these "things" aren't doing shit. So, effectively, it's the same stance I'm taking - just framed differently.

"What if X is done and Y is this?" That's my point. If nothing is changing despite our efforts, then nothing is being done. The Constitution is worthless right now and no number rhetorical questions will change that. Isolated, low impact regional flare-ups won't do much and can be locally suppressed and painted as disgruntled "ANTIFA" or whatever the state wants to call it next.

The Constitution is being ignored. We as a nation are failing to hold our government accountable in a meaningful way. If this election in November proves to actually unseat Trump's coalition, then the next step will be for politicians to fortify against him and others like him, then codify the changes in a way that can't be subverted by regular means.

Asking "What if" a bunch of times doesn't do or say a thing to help fix the Constitutional crisis we're now facing. So, get off your high horse and come down to earth with the rest of us who want to actually fight instead of casting unhelpful dispersions.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

You were asked to consider that people are doing things while others do useless things and others still don't know what to do. Basically to look at reality and suggest what should be done. This was my reading anyhow. Your reaction is to imply anyone who would question you is cool with the status quo. Basically you're useless but especially self righteous about it.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 days ago

I'm saying that the people who can and should enforce it are not only not doing anything, but blocking us from our normal measures.

We need to do extra.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If nobody does anything, it shows the constitution is worthless. It can’t or won’t be enforced.

That's 100% a problem with enforcement, not the American Constitution. "Nobody does anything" has nothing to do with the Constitution as written.

The Constitution is great, and has worked very well through even a Civil War and multiple crises. If it weren't, this robber administration would not be spending so much goddamn time in court trying to tear it all down.

The Constitution is a work of art, and the older I get the more brilliant I think it is. Don't knock it until you've studied it, and the 250 years of history it has already pulled us through.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Sorry your constitution is shit. It needs to be updated for modern times. It is not the holly relic you guys like to think it is.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As I said to another just now, the lawmakers are not doing their job. They're either ignoring or blocking the correct course. They're obligated to follow their oath to the Constitution. If that's not broken, then I don't know what is.

Furthermore, yes, it's an artful document that's 250 years old now. It needs a little help. It needs an update. In our current state, I could see our government using Chat Jippity to write those updates.

[-] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It had a good run, but it's been beaten to death now. We need a new one. Even the founding fathers never imagine it would last more than a few decades, nothing wrong with moving on now.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
228 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31022 readers
1247 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS