view the rest of the comments
Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.

I really don't understand this logic. If I'm pointing at something shitty they have done and someone knowingly joins them then nothing is lost. We just identified another shitty person.
If the argument is that with their popularity they misrepresent the Linux community, then why not make them infamous with posts like mine?
I would really like for you to convince me that dismissing the topic is the better course of action.
You present two options of cause and effect as mutually exclusive, but I think both options belong together as one.
You're not making them ONLY infamous with your post, but also equally famous with the crowd that might have otherwise missed them completely. A large community gives rise to influence.
You can for example look at how the german extreme right party is gaining more and more followers and support even though they are only ever in the news for outrageously dumb or criminal stuff they did.