247
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
247 points (98.1% liked)
Not The Onion
22404 readers
455 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
He absolutely had a good reason for that. It was crucial in the divorce settlement. You can't claim privacy when fucking around in your husbands bedroom.
According to the courts in this story, yes, she can.
That's her bedroom, too, by the way. Not just her husband's.
True that it is shared, but she helped an intruder into their bedroom, he has a right to film the intruder, and it is absolutely her own fault that she was on the pictures too.
The courts found that the husband was at fault here for recording.
What a weird comment to make??? That's what my entire comment was about to begin with.
A court in Taiwan, which made me comment that Taiwan is a weird place to make such a court judgement .
Repeating it over an over again is not making a point.
It's not her own fault for being the subject of a recording. It's the husband's fault for pressing record.
Thank god you're not a lawyer or involved in legal situations at all.