210

United States Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent insisted his country is "not at war" with Canada, then proceeded to mock the threat Canada could pose to his country with "submarines from the Edmonton mall."

The secretary also suggested Prime Minister Mark Carney was to blame for the current "political shouting match" between the two countries because keeping the fight alive is good for his poll numbers.

Bessent made the remarks Monday in an interview with the U.S. cable news network CNBC, where he was asked if his country is now in a trade war with Canada.

"Well, I don't think you can be in a tit for tat with someone that's 13 times larger than you are," he said.

"I mean we're not at war with Canada. How are we going to be at war with Canada? What, are they going to take their two submarines from the Edmonton mall and sic them on us?"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

We're talking about a very different study, but thank you!

[-] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

I'm not talking about a study, which means you (hopefully) misunderstood my comment. But thank you!

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Sorry; we are talking about a specific study done by the canadian armed forces - slightly different from what you're discussing. Said study did indeed address what you're describing however! One of the scenarios for the civil-war-triggering military action was the annexation/secession/alberta-ness, which would need to be backed by the US military (given that all but the southern edge would be a strategic nightmare to hold, especially when surrounded on three sides).

I'm not sure there's many parallels between hawaii and alberta, but I am super curious what you mean!

[-] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I'm not talking about a study. That's fine if you are.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think... Yes? I'm a tad confused, I confess: I don't think anyone here has misunderstood anything.

[-] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

A few comments implied I was referencing or talking about a study. I didn't understand why they thought I was, because I wasn't.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ah, I see. Sorry for any confusion, I just meant we were talking about a specific study.

[-] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

Then I guess the confusion isn't recoverable and we just have to accept that we can't communicate.

Sorry if I wasted your time, please have a great rest of your week.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
210 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

12349 readers
428 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS