charmbracelet/vhs a cli tool installs Chrome in the background without permission - is this still Open Source? (github.com)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by thingsiplay@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Edit: To clarify, my question if this is still Open Source wasn't meant literal. But more like "is this software still in the spirit of Open Source?" type of question. The better question would be probably, if we should allow this behavior or not.

Also saved it on Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20260902183330/https://github.com/charmbracelet/vhs/issues/438

So this issue is brought up by me over 2.5 years ago, and nothing changed since then. The issue is now the in top 3 highest upvoted Issue on this repo. At what point is it still open source, if it downloads without your permission a proprietary component that is used to run the software?

It connects to Google server and downloads Google Chrome. One user reported this process cannot be stopped with Ctrl+c (I didn't try that). It does not ask your permission to do so, and on the README nothing about this was (and still is) disclosed. All I asked is to add an information in the README, so anyone is warned and informed about this before installing. After over 2 years, none of the developers and contributors even acknowledge the issue or any comment whatsoever.

Note: vhs is a terminal application to record input and output of your terminal commands, to replay them later without video recording. Cool project and concept, but this is a no go and to me even malicious.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 10 points 1 week ago

Technically it is open source if .. the source is open source. Then, if it uses proprietary components under the hood as binaries, well... In that case any windows tool that uses Msvc redistributable would not be able to be open source.....

[-] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Agreed. I understand that, but my question wasn't meant to be a technical one. It was more like "is this still spirit of Open Source, if the core application is not part of the source, and it does all of that without permission". At least those Windows tools you mention, are using part of the operating system without doing something without permission (hopefully).

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Not to be an asshole but maybe this is the wrong question then.

Maybe the real question is "should we endorse this in the FOSS community" or "how do we handle things like this".

Which absolutely is a fair question.

[-] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I don't think there are wrong questions, if they meant to be curious and no trolling. But besides that, my refined question (you reply to) is actually what you suggest. Because to me, this is not really in the spirit of Open Source. But, if you don't like this question in the form I asked, I mean your suggestion is pretty much what I question myself (and its more direct).

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

it feels like an older iteration of free software -- shareware, freeware, warez, etc. -- where it's free to use, but still does proprietary shit under the hood.

in some respects, this type of software predates open sources, so it's always been around and now this makes it look like it's started wearing the open source vibe as a skin.