28

Now that's a heel turn if I've ever seen one.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/74818680

https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2026/08/msg00041.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, what exactly did the AI do?

If Linus said, "fix the kernel" and the LLM generated 1,000 lines of code that he dropped in, saw it was working, and called it a day, then that would be a problem.

If Linux said, "Where is the problem?" and LLM told him and then he fixed it himself, that's not a problem.

I don´t have a problem with LLM even generating code, I have a problem with programmers not understanding their craft and publishing code they don't fully understand.

The problem is that practically you need to take a hard line because how are you supposed whether something is unexamined slop or if it's been fully understood by a human? The only way to be sure a human understood it is to be sure a human wrote it, so blanket generative AI bans make sense.

[-] red_tomato@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

In this case it’s a two line change: change to round down instead of round up. I suppose it’s the latter where the AI assisted him in identifying which line should be changed.

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/818bebeb63dd6bf5f4e07e145f6cdbace520a34c

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Absolutely unacceptable. I'm downloading Haiku right now.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Here is a more detail article about what actually happened

https://www.xda-developers.com/linus-torvalds-fixed-a-linux-bug-using-ai-highlighting-both-the-strengths-and-weaknesses-of-the-new-tech/

It sounds like AI helped find the issue and write NOTES about it, but Linus explains he basically had to force the AI assistant because it kept on giving up. Linus wrote the fix himself.

I'd like to call it my tireless helper, but the AI several times stated flat out that this was impossible and unsolvable and that we should just write a report about it. I suspect those things have been trained by people who may not be quite as stubborn as I am.

You should do that anyway.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
28 points (79.2% liked)

Fuck AI

8110 readers
110 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS