43
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
43 points (97.8% liked)
Asklemmy
55453 readers
299 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah I think it was.
An interesting one too. It acts as a message to investors about AI's power, but also a message to users about it being a really messy and shite tool.
If I ask a piece of software to accomplish a task I don't want it to cause a buggerload of new problems in the process.
This is probably part of the reason why AI is getting so much investment but is not turning a profit.
It was 100% meant as a message to investors. It was a "OMG, look how powerful this thing is. It's so powerful you could totally 'accidentally' hack another company. ". The idea is to convince investors that it's almost there, there's just a little bit more to do, and you don't want to miss out on the gold rush that will come with finally getting it done.