13
submitted 2 days ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

I agree in some respects. If you have something like Gnome with 6 month development cycles, you are kinda encouraged to push features even if they are not ready, otherwise you have to wait 6 months to try again. And as we've seen with stuff like triple buffering, it was painful. It was almost ready, missed the cycle, then other Gnome changes were made, then it had to be rebased, then go back to step 1.

With a shorter cycle, missing a cycle isn't as big of a deal and in theory you can polish it more without it being the end of the world.

But Firefox already had a monthly release cycle. I don't see how going from a monthly to fortnightly is really that different.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
13 points (93.3% liked)

Firefox

23001 readers
19 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS