30
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)
Programming
28405 readers
357 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Just summarizing the title teasers:
10x faster by switching from JavaScript to Golang. Rust was not feasible because it does not have a GC/does not support circular dependencies, and they have many of those, and did not want a rewrite but a minimal effort switch.
AI may produce a lot more code, but what code does "90% of code" refer to. AI is not capable of novel or complex stuff, you still need humans in the loop. Juniors remain significant to train them into seniors.
Thanks for the summary! Initially I thought the headline was about writing Typescript programs 10x faster.
Thanks!
This seems to be both untrue and mostly irrelevant.
The recent FLT proof is clearly complex and novel.
But also a huge amount of programming is only barely complex and not really novel at all.
The biggest issues I've seen with AI so far are: