She acknowledges herself as the initiator/ aggressor in her Facebook post here:

In this post she

• acknowledges that she initiated the attack.
• acknowledges that the drink wasn't hers.
• states why she initiated the attack (online harassment?)
• claims she didn't make physical contact (video evidence challenges/ refutes this), but this is contradicted by her earlier statement.
• and acknowledges that she picked up a deadly weapon.

To those who think the woman was justified in their conduct here, you very much want her to get a good lawyer. Because her own words, along with the video, go very strongly against the narrative which people trying to set up here, that she was justified in her use of force along the escalation ladder.