607
submitted 13 hours ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/til@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Not accounting for the international conspiracy to cover up penguin behavior characteristics, the film interviews two men who were boys at the time as well as their family, friends, and archival materials.

Eyewitness testimony is legally valid, and it’s hard to imagine two different people had the same story, but the other - 50? 100? kids didn’t.

The film says it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and demands the bloody underwear be retrieved out of the trash before the cops find it like a duck.

He was phenomenally talented, there’s no doubt. But very troubled as well, and part of that was sexualizing young boys.

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

"Legal" ≠ "factually correct", though. ☝🏼

Again, you seem to be founding a lot on outdated and/or debunked views/methods like eyewitness testimony, and I'm hoping you take your experience from this thread to make some changes, fellow pleb. 🙇🏼‍♂️

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Seriously you people are way up in that tree with no interest at all in getting down, so. Ok. Have fun thinking MJ didn’t rape boys.

OJ wasn’t guilty either right

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Point of order: it's you that seems to get really excited about exactly that. Par for the course, though. 🤣

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I just like the truth. And it’s the truth.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
607 points (98.9% liked)

Today I Learned (TIL)

9198 readers
861 users here now

You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?

/c/til is a community for any true knowledge that you would like to share, regardless of topic or of source.

Share your knowledge and experience!

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS