1104
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thegerald@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

you got a point. Also I think that they get bought of either way, so why not safe a little on their salary ;)

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Because Congress sets its own salary. I don't. So, I have no say in the matter.

Also because there's no real "cost savings" in a material sense. Congressional spending has been decoupled from federal taxation since the Great Depression. Pay congressmen $1/term. Pay them $1M/hr. I don't see any kind of change in my material condition.

Incidentally, the Gingrich Era Contract with America was billed as a legislation package to rein in the capacity for Congresscritters to personally enrich and profiteer off their positions. Similarly, Pelosi's For The People Act included a number of reforms intended to prevent Congress from double-dealing and insider trading. Despite both Speakers enjoying a bicameral majority and a friendly President during their careers, neither successfully advanced legislation to handcuff members of Congress.

Asking Congress to regulate itself is a fool's request.

[-] thegerald@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Hey Thanks. I didn't know any of that.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
1104 points (96.2% liked)

Work Reform

17524 readers
1330 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS