77

Any press is good press. Filter out any mention of fashtech so that you can't be tempted to respond to it.

The picture is an example in #mbin. Lemmy might have it too

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] refalo@programming.dev -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What is this even in reference to?

DHH's post "As I Remember London" which I inferred from this post referring to Omarchy as "fashtech" and based on other recent posts about the same thing.

fear and hatred of strangers or foreigners

I don't see any fear or hatred of strangers or foreigners in the referenced post. I don't want to explicitly link it in case that would anger the mods somehow, but it is easy to find.

You may criticize his nationalism, immigration views, or rhetoric as exclusionary or ethnonationalist. But IMO calling him fascist requires showing more than concern about demographic change.

Is he using “gypsy” to refer to illegal immigrants?

I don't know, you would have to ask him. I was just pointing out that it's not objectively obvious as to their intent and I don't think people are reacting fairly, rationally or even attempting to use critical thinking.

Unfortunately social media amplifies outrage because it generates clicks, and attempting to have calm and reasonable discussions is often simply downvoted and ignored.

In this way I find that tech-central sites with active commentary like reddit/lemmy/phoronix/etc. are quite often just as cancerous as Facebook and such. You would think a lot more technical people would be more rational but I haven't found that to be the case the majority of the time.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

DHH's post "As I Remember London" which I inferred from this post referring to Omarchy as "fashtech" and based on other recent posts about the same thing.

As someone who doesn't give two shits about DHH, I legit had no idea what the post was referring to, so I've read the article.

It's grossly xenophobic and racist. The entire article is premised on the notion that non-"native Brits" are not actually British and do not actually embody British culture. This is fallacious for two reasons:

  1. It assumes that race and ethnicity define a person's culture, which is false.
  2. It assumes that British culture (or really the culture of any given area) would normally be stagnant, which is especially false in the information age.

It then attributes the supposed shift in culture to a shift in demographics rather than globalization and cultural mixing online that we've seen impact countries like South Korea and Japan.

The best interpretation I can give for the article is a Boomer's incoherent ramblings, and the default interpretation I'd have is that he's a white supremacist as he seems to look down on those he considers foreign.


There's absolutely nothing racist or xenophobic in saying that Denmark is primarily a country for the Danes, Britain primarily a united kingdom for the Brits, and Japan primarily a set of islands for the Japanese.

This statement, taken literally and without context, would be easy to make (again ignoring anything but the literal text). However, given the contents of the article, this is not what he's saying. I'll rephrase this statement to what he's saying, with connotations made explicit:

There's absolutely nothing racist or xenophobic in saying that Denmark is primarily a country for those of longstanding Danish descent, Britain primarily a united kingdom for those of longstanding British descent, and Japan primarily a set of islands for those of longstanding Japanese descent, and not for those of other heritages who wish to adopt those cultures.

Not racist? Not xenophobic? Lol.

[-] blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

You cannot lament your personal ideal of your country being diluted or ruined by the influx of people of other races without a significant amount of fear or hatred. Otherwise it wouldn't be an issue in the first place. The very thought requires othering a group of people determined to be undesirable.

[-] bombadil@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago

You cannot lament your personal ideal of your country being diluted or ruined by the influx of people of other races without a significant amount of fear or hatred

I disagree. I think it is possible to feel concern about cultural change without holding fear or hatred toward a specific group of people.

People might push back against change not because they're out to get anyone, but simply because they like how things are working now and worry that change will just cause a mess.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

I think it is possible to feel concern about cultural change without holding fear or hatred toward a specific group of people.

This is true, but not what his article does. It expresses concern about the changes he observed and attributes those changes towards a specific group of people (those he views as foreign). Context can't just be ignored.

[-] blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Those feelings cannot be rooted in anything except xenophobia. Mollifying the language doesn't get away from the root of where such sentiments even come from.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
77 points (92.3% liked)

Programming

28414 readers
315 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS