39
Anthropic Discloses Fourth AI Hacking Incident Involving Claude Opus 4.6
(thehackernews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
39 points (88.2% liked)
Cybersecurity
10558 readers
143 users here now
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
why are the executives of these companies not being held liable for computer misuse crimes?
if someone intentionally hacks into another system, thats a crime.
but building some LLM which manages to do it isnt a crime?
In my eyes this is no different than Autistici/Inventati. Both made a "tool". That tool was misused by someone. Both should be held to the same standards.
(Yes, we all know why they aren't)
What misuse did A/I user(s) get up to? I haven't seen anything indicating actual crimes.
I'd never heard of them, but it seems like their services were made mostly redundant by modern E2EE offerings anyway. There is no reason to use them over protonmail and signal.
"The anarchist cells responsible for sabotaging rail systems across France, Italy, Germany, and the Netherlands in 2026, relied on A/I Collective tools and services to claim responsibility for the attacks, publish official communiqués, and disseminate manuals for constructing improvised incendiary devices to target railways and other critical infrastructure."
Supposedly used the tools to coordinate their attacks. I haven't looked into the truth of it because ultimately I don't care because as you said, any modern e2ee offering could have been chosen.
Anthropic's LLM is not a person with its own personal liability. It's a tool that Anthropic uses.
Holding A/I responsible for the actions of anarchists that use their platform is like holding Google/Android responsible for the anarchists that use their platform.
Holding Anthropic responsible for the actions of Claude is like holding a person responsible for the actions of the gun that is in their hand.