96
Rule No. 01: never trust Zuck!
(lemmy.nz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
96 points (96.2% liked)
memes
22629 readers
2422 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
In the past I was dumb and published too much information about me, including photos.
Do you think its (more) dangerous or (slightly) helpful to login again after years of inactivity, probably need to agree to new TOS, and afterwards "delete" them myself or just leave it as is?
Are there any recent resources provided by civil rights organisations or political bodies, courts or similar with some recommendations in that matter? (I am an EU citizen.)
I'm in a much worse position in the USA, and counting on it being deleted automatically after a certain period of time due to inactivity.
But if they want to send me to a gulag instead, oh well, there's not much else I can do about it.
Anyway I would presume the same would work for you: just leave it be. They have everything from the past but no need to agree to more in order to obtain access to it now. Unless you can request deletion in some other method like sending them an email? They probably would be able to claim that they need a method to verify that it is you though?