127
submitted 12 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) by Jonawan@lemmy.zip to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 17 points 10 hours ago

I don't know if it's empathy or optics, but I'll take firing a Nazi as a win.

[-] zikzak025@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago

The cynic in me says it's 100% optics. No one would care if he was sharing Nazi ideology or imagery in a private group chat or internal team communication, but when you post it on Facebook for the world to see, that's when it becomes a potential PR disaster.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I agree it's likely optics but it says volumes about the political tides shifting.

6 months ago most Republicans would have happily sat down for dinner with Nick Fuentes on camera for a chat about Holocaust History.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

He only got fired when it got the attention of the media. He was perfectly fine spewing his Nazi propaganda around the office, and slipping it into the candidate's speeches, etc.

His opponent should take advantage of this: Why would you hire a 25 year old Nazi to run an important campaign? That shows some poor hiring decisions. Are these the kind of staffers we can expect if he wins?

[-] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago

I mean, that was kind of my point. I was replying to someone who said it was nice to see some empathy and I thought I'd chime in that it's possibly being done for optics, but I'll take one less Nazi in politics as a win.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
127 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31086 readers
1788 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS