Answer my catholic priests question.

No, I don't approve of Catholic priests molesting children, which is absolutely in no way comparable to using a shock collar on a dog. Allegedly using a shock collar on a dog.

But you’re not even denying the abuse anymore, just trying to deflect onto other things to protect your beloved abuser.

I am absolutely denying your made up bullshit, I'm just also not accepting the bullshit framing around the bullshit. Hasan didn't shock his dog, but even if he had, it's really not that significant.

You literally did the exact same thing already, in reverse. You claimed that even if he didn't shock his dog, he "barely gave a fuck" that it yelped which is "still condemnable."

This is exactly how you ratfuck someone. You talk shit about made up bullshit and then you've established that they're in the position of being "on trial" and once they're on trial, even if the original allegation doesn't stick, you can find something else to pin on them. This is why I'm making it clear that, not only is the original allegation nonsense, but even if it was true it wouldn't matter. You're only trying to cancel him because of the things he says politically, that, or you've fallen for an influence campaign by people who want that.