A maintainer. Apparently went into a hissy fit because people pointed out to him that he broke the rules. That said, the critics probably weren't very nice to him either.

Ah, Linux drama.

BTW, the rules sound sensible to me:

"In this section, "AI" refers to generative artificial intelligence tools, including Large Language Models and similar technologies.

All contributions are expected to be made by humans. AI tools may be used for research and learning, but all content in contributions must originate from and be understood by the contributor. This includes code, documentation, issues, security reports, pull request descriptions, and comments in all Void Linux community spaces.

ALL usage of AI tools MUST be disclosed.

Do not bring AI review tools into pull requests.

Usage of AI-powered human-language translation tools is acceptable to facilitate contributions across language barriers."

Esp. this part: "contributions must (...) be understood by the contributor."

I'm in a smaller community that sees a lot of AI-supported app development recently and while the outcome can occasionally be good, I'm not sure it's worth taking those with all the vibe coded projects that come along, and their "developers" that tend to get very defensive when simply asked about things.

Not saying this is the case here though.