783
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

But there is an important distinction between saying something deserves investigation and saying that something has been proven.

There is also an important distinction between what can be proven in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt (against the best lawyers money can buy), and what is likely to be true. There's absolutely no reason why we have to hold all criticism to the former standard, and it's completely unreasonable to do so.

It is not synonymous with social programs.

The fact that something benefits society does not make it socialism.

100% agreed, I never said anything remotely like that.

Socialism also isn’t simply a philosophy about “protecting workers.”

Agreed, however, protecting workers is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition of socialism. The goal of worker ownership is fundamentally driven by a desire to advance the interests of workers, which includes worker protection.

You can hard disagree with whatever you want it doesn’t make it any less true.

Yeah, it's not the fact that I disagree, but the arguments I made to support that disagreement that show your position is wrong.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
783 points (97.1% liked)

Work Reform

17513 readers
1684 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS