345
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
345 points (98.3% liked)
Privacy
50946 readers
1129 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I can think of countless cases of women sharing stuff on social media that they shouldn't.
The point is that creeps wear creep glasses.
Just because the author is being needlessly divisive for clicks doesn't mean you need to continue that chain.
Do you have stories of women or non-binary people abusing these glasses?
I'm sincerely asking.
I think remember reading one about a South Korean lady wearing them on dates and feeding the footage into Claude to analyze and improve her dating skills.
That's interesting! The article goes into some men using the glasses for the same thing:
I can see the benefits of that approach as long as the person being recorded is aware of what they're being used for.
I have no stories of anyone abusing these glasses other than the small handful of anecdotes in the article that can fit on one hand.
And as the article points out, 7M of these glasses were sold, so 2-3 stories is not exactly statistically significant or relevant.
I can find you numerous stories of female stalkers and creeps using cellphones though, if that is would help.
This is far from the first article I've seen covering these glasses. Many of them are posted to this community.
I'd honestly be interested to see if women and non-binary people are similarly abusing privacy issues with these glasses and in what circumstances. I haven't seen it reported.
Also, the article headline is that 'men wearing smart glasses on dates is a red flag'...
Regardless of the stats of who is being creepy currently, the headline is still wrong and needlessly gendered as anyone who wears them on a date is a red flag.
Talking about men who wear smart glasses on dates doesn't mean that everyone else who wears smart glasses is innocent.
:/
Come on now. My point is that the headline is needlessly divisive.
Do you really think that distinction changes that?
Do you have stories of women and non-binary people abusing smart glasses?
You seem real pleasant to be around, the real type of person that draws people to their cause and doesn't just alienate everyone!
Are you a politician or something? Dodging the question like kung fu
I haven't dodged, I've already said I didn't.
So then the rest of us can continue to discuss the specific scenario of the type of men who wear these glasses on dates. Thanks.
*people
This article is focusing on the type of men who wear smart glasses on dates. Focusing on one aspect of an issue doesn't mean no others exist.
The article even goes into detail about why men in particular might be more tempted to abuse smart glasses. Did you read the article?
*types of people
Bros so mad that men are the usual suspect lol
This article is focused on the type of men who wear smart glasses on dates. Does this article talk about another subject I didn't read about in the body of the article?
Yes, people who wear smart glasses and record without consent are bad. This particular article is looking at the type of men who do so on dates.
Are you regularly confused about subjects of articles?
No, the topic is the smart glasses and their use to intrude on other's privacy.
So new smart technology with cameras come out, people across the gender spectrum use them to be creeps (smartphones).
Now new smart technology with cameras come out (smart glasses), and you think the more valid evidence to look at is a handful of anecdotal stories, rather than applying similar statistics from the previous technology?
You're conflating me with the author of the article.
"Men that wear smart glasses" is not the same as "Men" to be clear. People who wear smart glasses with the intention of recording others without their consent is the topic here.
I haven't seen any articles or stories about women or non-binary people abusing smart glasses and I'm curious to read more if there are stories out there on that topic.
Are you implying that no women or non-binary people have at any point abused smart glasses? That'd be a statistically impossibilty considering at least 7 million creep glasses have been sold.
If not, and you agree that there has at some point been women or non-binary people abusing the glasses, simply through sheer statistics, then the headline is needlessly gendered.
Of course not. I'm asking if there are articles covering the topic of women and non-binary people abusing smart glasses. I'd like to see the circumstances and if there are any differences. I'm honestly curious.
This article is focused on the men who wear smart glasses on dates. That doesn't mean no one else is abusing these glasses.
whatabout