57
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
6132 readers
497 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Not better in terms of Metcalfe's Law.
Not better in terms of instantly being able to engage with your whole prospective audience, not having to build an audience one Fedi server at a time.
I say this as someone who has contributed money, servers, and PRs to alternative social media networks.
It is better for the planet, its better for mental health, better for diversity, accessibility, open information, its better in every way but the fact people won't move. the argument of "well people aren't there so im not even going to try" is frustrating because it abstracts the blame of lack of users to the platform instead of the individuals who are refusing to even try.
Metcalfe's Law? I've never heard of this mathematician. Or was she a chemist?
The value of a network grows with the square of the number of participants.
This explains winner-take-all dynamics in, eg, social networks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metcalfe's_law