Mapped: The U.S. States Hit Hardest by Canada’s Tariffs (www.visualcapitalist.com)

submitted 4 days ago by Scotty@scribe.disroot.org to c/canada@lemmy.ca

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Canada has responded to U.S. tariffs with sweeping duties on products including cheese and steel.
The Midwest and Great Lakes are among the most exposed regions, led by Ohio ($2.3 billion) and Illinois ($2.1 billion).
Several of the most affected states, including Michigan and Wisconsin, are politically important swing states.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] SomethingWentWrong@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

The USA is next door to Canada so of course we are going to trade with them. NAFTA/CUSMA have lead to closer integration between our economies that has been mutually beneficial but we are still separate sovereign countries.

Currently CUSMA restricts new free trade agreements with "non-market" economies which singles out China. Canada does not have a free trade agreement with China. We've made a trade deal with them that opens up imports for a limited number of vehicles.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Currently CUSMA restricts new free trade agreements with “non-market” economies

Non-CUSMA participants.

We really don't want to trade with the US. PAST, PRESENT, OR FUTURE.

[-] SomethingWentWrong@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago

Article 32.10 of CUSMA refers to non-market country free trade agreements with which no party has signed a free trade agreement:

https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/cusma-aceum/text-texte/32.aspx?lang=eng

The USA is the world's largest economy right next door. We do want trade but only if it is fair and stable.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

And doesn't involve the Americans, why do you keep leaving that off?

[-] SomethingWentWrong@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

I gave the link to CUSMA. I didn't think I needed to copy/paste the relevant bits but since you asked, per article 32.10 items 1(a) and 1(b) relates to a "non-market country free trade agreements with which no party has signed a free trade agreement":

https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/cusma-aceum/text-texte/32.aspx?lang=eng

Article 32.10: Non-Market Country FTA

For the purposes of this Article:

non-market country is a country:

(a) that on the date of signature of this Agreement, a Party has determined to be a non-market economy for purposes of its trade remedy laws; and (b) with which no Party has signed a free trade agreement.

I don't think I'm leaving anything out.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

China is a market economy as much as the US is. But it's still up to the US.

a Party has determined to be a non-market economy for purposes of its trade remedy laws; and (b) with which no Party has signed a free trade agreement.