302
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago

and that's why local models don't solve any problems with smart glasses. the only solution is to make wearing such hidden or not recording devices a criminal offence. to deter people from trying to do it. also make it know n to the people by making examples out of a few offenders, maybe staged.

[-] undrwater@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Another solution would be to make centralized facial recognition systems illegal.

That way, you can still carry your phone around and not be charged with "concealed carry of a camera".

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

yeah, then meta moves to process the video on your phone when it gets the chance, and upload the results to themselves.

That way, you can still carry your phone around and not be charged with "concealed carry of a camera".

its strange because we usually don't take it that way, but that is actually concealed carry of a camera

[-] riskable@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago

Your arguments are all against cameras recording people in public. That has nothing at all to do with AI. Local or not.

Local AI models do solve the privacy issue of everyone and everything being recorded, classified, and becoming permanently searchable for Meta and via any request they get from law enforcement, sketchy government entities, or anyone that's willing to pay for it.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Local AI models do solve the privacy issue of everyone and everything being recorded, classified, and becoming permanently searchable

no they don't. a) I don't know if you're giving the data to meta or the fbi or your local pedo ring. b) stop recording people without their fucking consent you chud

[-] riskable@programming.dev 0 points 3 days ago

WTF? Local models run on your local hardware without an Internet connection. Hence, they're not giving any data to anyone except you.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

the privacy issue

what part of ME, NOT TRUSTING YOU, trusting your shifty, creepy ass with my 'privacy' ain't you fucking getting?

[-] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

So you don't trust individuals with cameras but you trust the government and businesses with them. Got it.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

who the fuck told you I trust the government? like, fuck flock too,

bwahahaha.

but no I don't trust chuds, like you, who want everyone to wear cameras. get bent.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago

Your arguments are all against cameras recording people in public. That has nothing at all to do with AI. Local or not.

yes, and this whole post is about cameras recording people in public. not AI. you then said local AI is the solution. then I said it is not a solution.

Local AI models do solve the privacy issue of everyone and everything being recorded

they don't, because again, nobody can tell if that person is using local AI, or if they are collecting data for uploading later.

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
302 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

88185 readers
3229 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS