122
submitted 18 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Good thing we now know the next president can label the executives that follow through a national security threat, freeze their accounts, sanction them and force the sale of any company needed to another American company of choice then revoke their families citizenship and deport them to a country they have never been to or speak the language. (Or just a prison camp)

Or are those just legal acts when done by Trump?

Oh wait I forgot he already set Republican support of the U.S. government buying stake in the company as well. I suppose that means they can just take majority stake and assign someone in their cabinet to run it like Rubio's supposedly doing Venezuelas oil deals.

All of these things show this government system can't continue as it is or it will guarantee a constant rise of the population being accosted and mistreated until there truly is a collapse.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago

Or are those just legal acts when done by Trump?

Wilhoit's Law applies:

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition ... There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 12 hours ago

Or to put it in other terms, Conservatism says:

  • I get to do what I want.
  • You have to do what I say
[-] zd9@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

wow I want some of whatever psychedelic you're on. That shit would never happen. Any Democrat that the oligarchs allowed to get elected would never do anything that actually threatens their economic interest.

I agree with you to a point, but the reason Trump's administration has had to try to roll back restrictions placed against such companies during both his administrations is because those regulations were indeed signed in.

[-] zd9@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

When were the regulations signed in though? In an era different from today. Without major reform or minor revolution we wouldn't be able to get back to that era.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Biden passed the 2024 Powerplant regulations that they are rolling back now, and Obama passed the clean power plan 2015 built on the 2009 greenhouse gas engagement finding performed during his first term.

So the eras were the last 3 times Republicans were not in office

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
122 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

9000 readers
739 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS