15
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
15 points (100.0% liked)
Language Learning
1028 readers
11 users here now
A community all about learning languages!
Ask / talk about a specific language or language learning in general.
Sopuli's instance rules apply
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar whackos and no endorsement of them
- No porn
- No ads or spam
- No content against Finnish law
Other active Lemmy language communities:
- !duolingo@lemmy.world
- !japaneselanguage@sopuli.xyz
- !chinese@lemmy.world
- !learn_finnish@sopuli.xyz
- !german@lemmy.world
- !latin@piefed.social
- !estonian@sopuli.xyz
- !spanish@sopuli.xyz
- !translator@sopuli.xyz (translation studies)
- !esperanto@sopuli.xyz
- !learnnorwegian@thelemmy.club
Other communities outside Lemmy:
Community banner & icon credits:
Icon: The book cover of Babel (2022 novel by R. F. Kuang)
Banner: Epic of Gilgamesh tablet (© The Trustees of the British Museum)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I find that digging into the words help. In your case, you're mixing them up because they are indeed related! Somebody who's costaud has strong côtes (according to the CNRTL, they are not 100% sure either).
In my case with Chinese words I learnt to write them so I'd distinguish 我找钱 much more clearly, but I still get the odd mistake like when I confused 午(noon) next to a horse for 牛 (cow)... I was very confused as to why the horse was labeled as cow. But yeah, the general idea is to have more data from more senses to sort the words better in my brain.
Their shape, their sound, the way to write them (physical movements), a picture of what they represent, an anecdote tied to the word, or in this case to learning the word, etc.
Ah, yes, etymology got me a long way with my native language, but I never dive into it for my foreign languages, partially because I'm just in a hurry....
They're also usually located in native language dictionaries, the reading of which make me break out in hives.
Speaking of which:
I didn´t know about the CNTR but here is the etymologie of two related (?) words from that site and I can't make sense of it, honestly. I'm used to an etymology tracing the root word from latin, (then often what it turned to in French), to what that word turned into in English; yet, I see no mention of any root words at all in these entries:
bête
embêter
Haha! Yeah these are hard to parse, even for us. It's full of abbreviations, for a start. But they do tell you the story of the words as best as is available, and do tell you clearly when a link is a hypothesis, a guess, etc. With references.
So bête comes from beste in old french (ca 1100 means circa 1100, ie, around the year 1100). A.fr. is an abbreviation for ancien français. It's interesting because similarly for the adjective version, it starts around 1200 (so I'm guessing we have direct sources with the word appearing) and then in the 18th century dictionary, we start discussing the path from latin towards French. By successive borrowing (Empr. meaning emprunté, ie borrowed).
It's not always super clear and concise because, well, language isn't ;)