269
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
269 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
88080 readers
4412 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
No way I'd ever be paying that.
How would you get around that? That amount of money is most certainly take-you-to-court worthy.
I'd just not pay it?
They will take you to court. When you lose, they will order you to pay. When you do not pay, they will garnish your wages. You would end up paying, the original debt, plus all of the legal fees and fines.
This is not something that gets sent to a debt collector who will call you a bunch of times before selling your debt to someone else.
Then court it is. The debt isn't in the father's name. The company would have to sue for it.
My credit card can only go to like $5000. Anything extra is the company's negligence.
The company will pay it, then it will sue the father for the non-work related charges. Maybe Google will cave and dismiss most or all of the charges. But if they do not, the company most certainly will not eat it and be satisfied. Losing his job would be the least of his worries. They will eventually petition to have the court collect the money via force (garnishment). Trust me, either way, you’d end up paying at least some amount.
I don't know if it's for sure thing that the company would pay, honestly, either.
It could possibly just get stuck in accounts payable.
Do you know how credit cards work by chance
Contract law isn't usually loser pays.
I don’t understand what you are trying to say.
They're trying to say that losing a contract dispute doesn't make you liable for 'all' of the legal fees, just your own.
In some situations the plaintiff can also have the defendant be required to pay their legal fees, this just isn't one of them.
Well...perhaps YouTube's TOS means you agree to pay such fees, if the father signed the kid up and agreed to them. And a court always has discretion, even if the default is to pay your own fees.
That's fair, you're right that there's more nuance to it and it may be as you say. I just wanted to provide a layman's explanation for future readers.