this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
534 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

34988 readers
378 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Even if it’s just the OS keeping apps on memory for faster launches. If you do need heavy RAM for a task your OS is clever enough to reshuffle things.

The problem is that when it is relocated, processor consumption increases. And as matter of fact, my operating system doesn't cache anything and still opens applications very quickly, even faster than Windows.

Used RAM does use more electricity but that is so neglible it’s a non-issue and no argument.

Maybe isn't a issue to you but for anyone with a laptop it is and it's pretty visible.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What processor are you using, a 486? Memory management should be effectively instant on any modern platform.

I also find it extremely hard to believe that your unspecified OS doesn't do any caching. Even vxworks does caching.