215

Signal has started rolling out Signal Login, an optional registration method that allows users to create a Signal account without providing a phone number. The feature will be rolled out first on Android and will come to iOS later.

As we previously reported, Signal Login is not a free alternative registration method. Signal requires users who choose to register without a phone number to make a one-time payment. The price at launch is $2.99 / € 3.49, although this may vary by region and currency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Soatok@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

however what is less known is that blogger removed a response in the comments from an OMEMO developer who clarified some things (you can it read here), which personally I think was rather odd/bad faith of them to do.

My blog hasn't had comments enabled for years. People can write their own blog posts if they want to respond to something. Not becoming a dumping ground for other people isn't "bad faith".

Furthermore, I didn't remove a response. I've always held comments in a moderation queue back when I did allow them, and I didn't approve it. That's all.

The reason for the moderation queue is obvious to most people, but if you find yourself unaware: Being openly queer, or part of the furry community, or both opens you up to a lot of harassment networks that try to cause grief. They might dox you and post this in a blog comment so it shows up on search engines, for example. So I never wanted to deal with that retroactively.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Could you elaborate how their response would be making your comment section a 'dumping ground'? Was it not directly relevant to your issues with XMPP and OMEMO?

I’ve always held comments in a moderation queue back when I did allow them, and I didn’t approve it. That’s all.

What was your reasoning for not approving it?

[-] Soatok@pawb.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Could you elaborate how was their response would be making your comment section a ‘dumping ground’?

My blog exists for me to publish my writing. If other people want their own writing published, they should publish it on their own blog. "Mopar" clearly was capable of doing so.

Was it not directly relevant to your issues with XMPP and OMEMO?

Does relevance matter? If so, why?

What was your reasoning for not approving it?

What is your reasoning for thinking I owe you or anyone an explanation? My blog, my rules.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Does relevance matter? If so, why?

I guess I'm trying to understand what about the OMEMO developer's comment made you not want to approve it in comparison to the 19 other comments you did approve.

What is your reasoning for thinking I owe you or anyone an explanation?

You don't owe anyone anything, I'm just trying to make sense of why you would choose to not publish that comment.

Based on the information I have at hand, it seemed like you wrote some strong opinions about the bad qualities of XMPP, and then opted to not approve a comment with information that may have made your opinions seem less strong? Without further insight into why you didn't want that comment seen on your blog, I personally can't come up with a different explanation that fits. 🤷

[-] Soatok@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's not your or anyone else's place to "understand" arbitrary decisions I made years ago. Whatever point you want to emphasize is moot anyway: Comments are disabled and users are encouraged to blog independently if they want to remark on something I wrote.

Consider yourself corrected on the "removed" remark.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
215 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

6187 readers
1 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS