51

and more importantly: a response to all the cis people responding to the way that trans people are responding to said Democrats’ responses

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dippy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

What a fun hypothetical you just made, now do a real one with the two people who have the capability to win the senate seat in Texas where you look at detailed policy distinctions across every issue that will affect real humans

[-] A_be_seedy@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

The article and its surrounding discussion as well as your hypothetical is about something real.

Seems like you don't like my hypothetical because you don't believe trans people are real humans. This is wrong.

[-] Dippy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

Talarico would still be a safer choice for trans people than Ken Paxton but totally, saying people should not vote for Talarico is the choice that doesnt play with the lives of real-life trans people like we dont matter

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 day ago

That too is covered in the article FFS

[-] Dippy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago
[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 day ago

Yet we can't be bothered to address what the author said.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
51 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

4950 readers
318 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS