265

Although everyone has their own reasons for exploring a new hobby, one of the driving factors behind the popularity of Meshtastic and MeshCore has been the incredible accessibility offered by off-grid LoRa mesh networks. You don’t need any expensive hardware or a license to get on the air — armed with a $20 microcontroller dev board and open source software, you could be on the mesh in minutes. Then came the really exciting part, seeing who else was out there. The low barrier of entry and ad-hoc nature of these projects meant there was a good chance you’d soon find yourself exchanging messages with other like-minded folks in the area.

Or at least, that’s how it used to be. With the recent revelation that their default radio configurations have potentially been in violation of the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) regulations governing amateur usage of the 900 MHz industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) band, the users and developers of both Meshtastic and MeshCore have been sent scrambling. Getting in compliance isn’t necessarily a technical challenge. In fact, Meshtastic has already introduced changes aimed to address the issue and anyone running the latest alpha release can be sure that their initial radio configuration will meet FCC standards.

But unfortunately, this introduces a new problem. While it’s easy enough to get new installations of Meshtastic and MeshCore operating in a mode that keeps the FCC happy, doing so breaks compatibility with everything that’s already been deployed. The community will be fractured into distinct strata depending on when they first configured their hardware, with an added dash of confusion from the more rebellious users who will undoubtedly refuse to migrate over to the new settings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

Also, isn't LoRa based on proprietary technology?

[-] cenzorrll@piefed.ca 5 points 2 days ago

The physical layer is proprietary, the signals it produces is not. So if you can develop a way to reproduce the signals without using or stealing their hardware you're good.

There are efforts to reverse engineer it.

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago

Yes. The actual modulation itself is proprietary, but everything above that is open source.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

Regardless, if let's say the company producing the hardware decides to stop producing it, then there's nothing anyone else can do about producing new ones, right?

[-] randombullet@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

I guess kinda?

I think there are unfortunately only 1 transceiver that supports Meshtastic Meshcore

Semtech SX1262 which is an American company

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Semtec owns LoRa.

The SX1262 is LoRa generation 2

The LR1110 is LoRa generation 3

And the LR2021 is LoRa generation 4

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
265 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

88155 readers
5576 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS